Clicky

Brickell City Centre Could Pave The Way For Taller Towers In The Downtown Area

Taller towers could be in store for downtown Miami, following the Federal Aviation Administration’s decision to approve Swire Properties’ One Brickell City Centre last week.

A height limit that had restricted towers in the area to 1,010 feet is being lifted to 1,049 feet.

Swire had initially proposed to build a tower that reached 1,111 feet above sea level. After negotiating with the FAA, the height of the proposed tower was reduced to 1,049 feet, which the agency eventually approved.

During negotiations, the Miami-Dade Aviation Department informed the FAA that they were considering increasing the height limit over parts of downtown Miami from 1,010 feet to 1,049 feet, helping to clinch the favorable decision (TNM will publish the revised height atlas soon.)

In a letter, the FAA wrote that the new tower will require revised procedures for planes taking off and landing Miami International Airport, including increased climb gradients and raised minimums for planes on approach. Unusually, Swire will be required to notify the FAA six weeks prior to starting construction so that the agency can publish new Minimum Vectoring Altitudes and Minimum Obstruction Clearance Altitudes for the area.

Although those revisions are not considered to be significant, they could affect fuel requirements for airlines. Parties who oppose the approval, including airlines, have until August to file an objection.

 

Leave a Reply

7 Comments on "Brickell City Centre Could Pave The Way For Taller Towers In The Downtown Area"


Anonymous
17 hours 20 minutes ago

How will these buildings do if a Cat 5 hits Miami again?

Fredric
16 hours 49 minutes ago

Tall buildings which are constructed in Miami today must conform to a strict building code and have to be able to withstand 175 mph winds. I wonder how the skyscrapers in New York City will hold up if a Cat 4 hurricane strikes? Perhaps this means that no more skyscrapers should be built there and the ones already standing should be dismantled? How about Houston, where a Cat 5 hurricane is at least as likely to strike as Miami, should tall buildings be banned now there too? And what about Los Angeles and San Francisco? I guess no more new construction in those cities too because of the earthquake risk, right?

Anonymous
14 hours 19 minutes ago

Not even talking about Asia, which is being hit every year by typhoons of maximum strength, yet builds buildings much taller than anything even remotely discussed here.

Anonymous
15 hours 40 minutes ago

The heck with these very tall buildings, the question is, how well will the entire city of Miami be if a “Cat 5″ hurricane hit?

Fredric
10 hours 44 minutes ago

Probably quite well, actually. Don’t forget that Miami is one year shy of reaching 120 years of existence (since it was incorporated, that is) and has been hit over and over again by major hurricanes. One storm in 1926 that hit Miami directly was just shy of Category 5 strength. I have seen numerous photos of the aftermath as well as some old film footage and not a single hi-rise structure that existed in downtown Miami then was even severely damaged, let alone knocked down altogether. Most of the damage that occurred was due to storm surge and that was mostly in the immediate shoreline areas.

There would be a lot of damage if a Cat 5 hurricane struck Miami, yes. And immediately following that, there would likely be an unprecedented building boom, partially using the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund that the state has been investing in for the past ten hurricane-free years and now runs well into the billions of dollars of reserve. This fund is used to back up private property insurers so that the latter will not be so reticent in accepting property insurance policies in Florida, for fear that they would go bankrupt following a disastrous hurricane. And the gamble that Florida made in investing in this fund over the years has now paid off, so this just about guarantees that ample insurance money would be available if Miami got a big hit and ironically, that would stimulate the economy greatly, as happened in south Miami-Dade county following hurricane Andrew, for example.

A lot of people who make comments about the threat of hurricanes or sea-level rise are not really concerned for Miami’s well-being. Instead, their opinions reveal a rather transparent dislike for Miami, along with an attempt to disguise this by bringing up the issue of natural disaster, as if this means that Miami should be shut down altogether so as to prevent such calamity. Of course, every location on Earth faces threat from natural disasters, so this really isn’t any more an issue in Miami than it is anywhere else. But the difference is that Miami is undergoing an unprecedented and rapid transformation into a World-Class city,
so naturally this is going to bring forth feelings of jealousy and anger from those who are envious about that.

Anonymous
17 hours 8 minutes ago

If parties opposing the approval have until August to file an objection, this will be ample time for mayor Tomas Regalado to come up with a reason to be against this. Maybe Norman Braman will file a suit which will claim that Miami residents’ civil rights are being violated should any structure taller than his new luxury car dealership be approved.

Jz
8 hours 51 minutes ago

Regarding cat 5 storms, there’s this thing called insurance…