Miami Set To Take On FAA’s New Height Limits

Miami commissioners are preparing to vote on a resolution protesting a new policy by the FAA that could further reduce building height limits within the city.

At the behest of airlines, the FAA is planning to add ‘one engine inoperative’ as a consideration when deciding whether or not to approve new buildings. Airlines have complained that since they are required to plan for OEI, they are forced to burn more fuel and take longer routes as new structures encroach into airspace. The FAA had previously considered this to be an economic issue.

A 2008 agreement between the city and county on height limits, which was was crafted with input from the FAA, could be jeopardized. Currently, the city will not issue a building permit without an approval letter from the FAA. Developers could ask the city and county to ignore the FAA’s new rules and grant construction permits without FAA approval, but they still would risk being unable to obtain insurance on the new buildings.

The FAA’s new rule was published in the Federal Register in April. A public comment period will close on June 27.

PreviouslyFAA Considers Further Reducing Height Limits In Downtown Miami

 

3 Comments

  1. Gared

    June 11, 2014 at 5:10 pm

    Makes sense,1,-FAA rule is not binding by law,only by an agreement.
    2,It is guided by fuel economics only,there are different angle and altitude approaches,mainly from the east,not being considered because of the inconvenience to the airlines.Looking at the runways,there is not a direct landing obstacle between the ‘Venetian causeway’ and ‘Rickenbacker causeway’ these forming a ‘V’toward the airport
    ‘One engine inoperative’could hit 10 story building as well as’Palmetto Expressway’.It seem’s the theory is”you let them,they will dwarf you in minute”.

    • Gordon Lee

      June 18, 2014 at 9:23 pm

      One engine inop refers to if an engine goes out during takeoff. Has nothing to do with landing.

  2. XVS

    June 11, 2014 at 7:29 pm

    Miami should self-insure. That’s no-brainer. It’d be a great cash flow for city’s needs, if planes don’t keep slamming into the buildings.

Leave a Reply

Login with your Social ID

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>