City Studying Building New I-95 Ramp In Downtown Miami

Miami has commissioned a study on building new traffic ramps in downtown Miami.

“A traffic study to see if we could do the elevated ramp,” commissioner Joe Carollo said at a July 13 commission meeting.

At the meeting, Carollo asked city officials for a cost update on the study.

A $400,000 fee for the study had been “proffered” by the developer planning the 3-tower Hyatt Regency redevelopment known as Miami Riverbridge, according to Carollo.

The study has already started, and will cost less than the $400,000 given by the developer to the city, an official told commissioners.

The Miami Herald reported that the developer is funding a study on extending the I-95 on/off ramp to Biscayne Boulevard to alleviate traffic in the area.

In addition to the study, developers Hyatt and Gencom have agreed to at least $10 million in other traffic improvements in a new lease deal for the property, including:

  • the widening of 4th street
  • signal light synchronization
  • new bike lanes & sidewalks
  • walkway under bridge
  • new pedestrian bridge to the metromover

The developer also agreed to build 480 feet of upgraded riverwalk and increased open space (over an acre) at an estimated cost of $15,000,000.

Commissioners voted at the meeting to approve the lease deal.

 

122 Comments
most voted
newest oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Make Miami Sophisticated Again
2 months ago

Stop building highways and expand public transit now!

Anonymous
2 months ago

🙌🏻

SMS
2 months ago

To transform the overpass from a tangled bowl of spaghetti into a visually appealing and pedestrian- and bike-friendly underpass, we can streamline and reduce the impact of its design and construct monumental bridges over the highway exit. By lowering the I95 ramps and instead elevating the avenues, we can also add dedicated bike paths and wide walkways on the fixed Central Park style avenue bridges.

We can promote alternative transportation options and create a safe environment for cyclists and pedestrians. These changes will not only enhance the underpass’s aesthetics but also encourage active commuting and a vibrant community.

Anonymous
2 months ago

comment image

comment image

comment image?s=612×612&w=gi&k=20&c=H2CZy6VUlRoTK65bS-JywsjzsFQzssY2vN-GGYzT6mo=

comment image?crop=1065%2C667%2Cx0%2Cy0&width=1280

comment image?crop=1065%2C666%2Cx0%2Cy0&width=1280

https://slate.com/human-interest/2015/11/the-dutch-city-of-zutphen-builds-two-new-underpasses-that-look-like-works-of-art.html

Patrick Bateman
2 months ago

Well, we have to end apartheid for one. And slow down the nuclear arms race, stop terrorism and world hunger. We have to provide food and shelter for the homeless, and oppose racial discrimination and promote civil rights, while also promoting equal rights for women.

SMS
2 months ago

Other ideas:

Another idea involves incorporating bike paths that meander through rainforest gardens and alongside lakes that help regulate flooding, while also transforming underpasses into bridges to improve the area.

comment image

Cover the Podiums
2 months ago

I love it!

Ramirez
2 months ago

But there’s 4 potential cars in that picture. Would you really rather they just walk or bike instead of contributing to traffic like normal American cities?

Anonymous
2 months ago

mosqutio hell

Anonymous
2 months ago

There’s fountains and flowing water that prevents them, and we have misquote management strategies in the present modern era.

Anonymous
2 months ago

wow, just more money to chase something that no one really needs. This is how you bankrupt a city, a county, a state, a nation. Somethings have to be left ugly, and organically something beautiful will happen in those spaces. Right now this is the Vancouverization of a suggestion

Anonymous
2 months ago

No bro, all the poorer cities have this kind of stuff. Maybe we stop paying for Joe Carollos lifestyle and whatever unnecessary business is going on and invest in our City.

Anonymous
2 months ago

If smaller towns in Florida can afford to invest in lakes, fountains, and bike paths, then it becomes evident that these amenities are not a luxury but rather basic, common needs for a city of Miami’s size and stature. By following the successful examples of these towns, Miami can allocate the necessary funds and prioritize these essential features without straining its budget. The demonstrated financial feasibility emphasizes the importance of investing in these amenities as a fundamental requirement for enhancing the city’s livability, reflecting its status, and catering to the needs of its residents and visitors.

Anonymous
2 months ago

your logic is so bizarre. If smaller towns can afford XYZ it is a basic common need? NO, you haven’t made any point other than to be jealous of small-town life and think that everyone gets to have that level of individual care in their environment. A city is not meant for that. It is exactly what Vancouversization is and it leads to a much large disparity in wealth between citizens. Miami has plenty of that already and maintains a vast network of park spaces.

Anonymous
2 months ago

At least nobody will be camping or parking in the serene waters and it would break up the mass of concrete.

Anonymous
2 months ago

Here is a project that can be done quickly and make a huge improvement. Turn under the Downtown Brickell bridge into a park with beautiful lighting, rather than that ugly Florida State parking lot that nobody uses. There’s already a park called Martí Park but it should be reconfigured and expanded over those ugly lots.

Anon
2 months ago

Jesus. Carollo is the worst commissioner ever. Has he ever proposed any idea ever that was not a total and complete disaster in every way?

Hella
2 months ago

Lock her up!

Anonymous
2 months ago

Stop paying her attorneys fees. She’s driving up cost of living one controversy at a time!

Anonymous
2 months ago

To be fair, the same can be said about most commissioners, city and county.

Anonymous
2 months ago

“Extending the I 95 on/off ramp to Biscayne Blvd”? That will be hideous, visually unattractive solution for the area.

Downtown resident
2 months ago

With the exception of the Brickell Ave bridge, the areas under the highway between downtown and brickell create homeless encampments that form a barrier preventing downtown from benefitting from Brickell’s popularity. It’s too dangerous to take little kids under the bridges to walk the S Miami Ave & SW 2nd Ave bridges. Nothing against the homeless- it’s just a fact that its too dangerous to stroll along with a toddler. I suspect part of this development will aim to fix that by redoing the bridges and improving the area but I don’t know all the details

Pedestrian Promenades
2 months ago

It’s not the overpasses that being homeless here. It’s the people feeding them there and the neglect of innovation to turn them into something remarkable like they are doing with 395 and the Underline. It’s going to be incredible when it’s all done!

Anonymous
2 months ago

Yes they need to fix this area entirely and make under the bridge beautiful waterfront parks like Riverside Park did with the flyovers and highways along the Hudson River! It’s the best park in NYC and you’d never know you’re under a highway.

Anonymous
2 months ago

Don’t forget under Metromover flyovers, too.

Anonymous
2 months ago

Miami just need more public transportation no more highway too much traffic

Ana
2 months ago

Agreed, Miami is good, don’t change it too much, just add more accessibility without removing

Anonymous
2 months ago

Do the opposite, no more flyovers – convert them to tunnels. The city should retain the land above the tunnels and sell ground leases to fund the construction of it. Self sustaining.

Anonymous
2 months ago

Fly overs are the best part of downtown. They look buzzy modern and futuristic, and make this city come to life. They are one of my favorite parts of downtown Miami and such an enjoyable experience to get a Birds Eye tours of the city.

Anonymous
2 months ago

I agree with you about the flyovers, they are cool, despite what these hipsters from the NE are saying

Anonymous
2 months ago

Truly ironic when they want to freeway flyovers removed and streetscape improved, yet want Metromover to be extended for miles.

Anonymous
2 months ago

the*

Ramirez
2 months ago

Flyovers for rail are cool, cars are boring and cause traffic

Anonymous
2 months ago

Standing on Metromover next to a puking bum is your version of excitement? We gotta talk Rammy

Anonymous
2 months ago

Never seen that on our metros. They are clean and safe. I have seen people do that on Miami Beach though.

Anonymous
2 months ago

“our metros”…that’s because you either don’t live here or moved here 15 minutes ago. FYI, NOBODY local calls Metrorail and Metromover “metros”.

Anon
2 months ago

They only look “futuristic” to people that can’t see how archaic the technology is.

People are whisking themselves from city to city in 300mph electric trains all over the world – but here in the U.S. we have people who think our aging 1960’s infrastructure looks “modern”. Bro, travel a bit.

Anonymous
2 months ago

theyre not being whisked all over by 300 mph trains, those speed are reached on strait long stretches between cities, not urban metromover stops

Anonymous
2 months ago

Bro, get a job!

Matt
2 months ago

Bruh it’s Miami we can’t do tunnels because of flooding.

Anonymous
2 months ago

What about that tunnel to the port? Exactly…

Anonymous
2 months ago

the tunnel to the port, that required three revamps of engineering, and went over budget by 2x and also took twice as long to create as they said? Imagine the kind of quagmire it will create by doing the same thing to I95. Never gonna be worth it. Also the flooding in those tunnels would be epic if it ever happened.

Anonymous
2 months ago

the tunnels are already having leaking problems

Anon
2 months ago

Really? Fort Lauderdale has a tunnel right in the middle of their downtown. They are actually rehabbing it now, as it has been open for several decades.

Completed riverwalks, tunnels…sigh

Anonymous
2 months ago

three decades and it already needs rehabbing? Thats not good ROI for your city and the tax payers. Stop listening to these beautifucation-project-first people. It will bankrupt us.

Anonymous
2 months ago

You mean like our Miami Airport? We are not getting infrastructure we need fast enough. Bring in the money and start the renovations Suarez.

Anonymous
2 months ago

You mean like that signature bridge?

Javanka
2 months ago

It floods in Vermont.

Rabbit
2 months ago

This post would be okay if any of it were true, or you had any great ideas, or accurate thoughts.

The PortMiami tunnel was on time, underbudget, and won awards Internationally for Engineering and the Financial structures used to construct it and operate it over the years.

https://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/editorials/article29907982.html

Anonymous
2 months ago

OMG, tunnels are not possible in Miami, we have been over this and the engineering that will be required is not worth it. When they built the tunnel to the port it was way more than expected time and money wise.

Anon
2 months ago

How did Fort Lauderdale do it? We need a better Governor and some more forward thinking Commissioners.

Anonymous
2 months ago

they did it in once place and it annoys the hell out of the people that live there. they arent proposing more tunnels in Ft. Lauderdale, that should tell you how that went.

Rabbit
2 months ago

Wrong. Not a little bit wrong.
Totally wrong.
100% wrong.
No partial credit for showing your work either…

Anonymous
2 months ago

I’d rather be above ground than under ground! I hate the subways in the north east. Our above ground metro lines are so fun to ride and look cool to watch from my balcony.

Anonymous
2 months ago

yes, our city is prettier at any given time than nyc, we should show case it with above ground transportation, which is also 10x cheaper

Anonymous
2 months ago

Metros are great above ground. Highways are fine too but when they get to be massive, they should be designed to look nice. Also the bridges need to be raised or lowered.

Yeppers
2 months ago

My brother in Christ, please stop building more highways.

Anonymous
2 months ago

Literally tear that whole spaghetti mess up and restore that area to its previous state. It’s disgusting how backwards Miami can be sometimes

Anonymous
2 months ago

its previous state? NOT JUST BIKE crowd can’t help themselves. look another fly over to Biscyane is obscene and not needed, but taking that thing down is just as obscene and insane. IF IT AINT BROKE DONT FIX IT.

Anonymous
2 months ago

Remove it and redesign it to add bridges and pedestrian paths that don’t go up and down

ANON
2 months ago

It is broke, though, that thing is a blight on the whole neighborhood.

Anonymous
2 months ago

what neighbrohood? over 300k travel that bridge in each direction. How are you going to deal with that for 15 years as they do constrcution. The people on here just don’t like to think of commerce as much as beauty.

Anonymous
2 months ago

I actually dont really like Not Just Bikes dude but let’s admit it, this spaghetti mess isnt necessary.

Anonymous
2 months ago

I-95 should terminate at 195 and become a surface level boulevard. With all of the developments on both sides of 95 in this area it would become one of the greatest boulevards in the country. Wynwood and Brickell could expand Westward. Overtown could heal a little after having its heart torn out when these highways were first built.

Rabbit
2 months ago

Agree with the first part. It would be great to eliminate all those elevated highways and instead have a Grand Boulevard, shift the GenCom Hyatt to the north and have a Riverfront Park from Brickell Ave to Miami Ave.

Anonymous
2 months ago

dude that was 75 years ago,… grow up

Anonymous
2 months ago

Your plan would “tear the heart out” of Miami’s commerce and commutes, but you’ll have your pretty little SoyBoy Boulevard, and it’s your perception of beauty that matters most here!

Anonymous
2 months ago

During rush hour that section of 95 is already at a standstill. You don’t need an elevated highway for gridlock urban traffic. If you are actually trying to access downtown then you can more easily exit a boulevard. If you are trying to bypass downtown then you shouldn’t expect to drive directly through the center of it. A boulevard would be better for economic development of the surrounding areas and would be good for commerce.

Anonymous
2 months ago

BS—a boulevard with multiple traffic light would be even WORSE. For whatever reason you ignore the fact that many driving I95 are NOT driving into downtown.

Rabbit
2 months ago

Those are Federal Projects.
Blame your Federal Government bureaucrat.

Anonymous
2 months ago

No flyovers and no tunnels. If people want to get to I-95, have them drive a few blocks west like they do in Brickell.

Anonymous
2 months ago

Brickell is right off i95. No flyovers needed.
Love it. Except the metro mover ones are awesome and activate pedestrian activity so people don’t have to cross over tracks.

Anonymous
2 months ago

How about spending money to actually reduce traffic by providing top-notch public transportation?!?

Rabbit
2 months ago

Who me?
Who are you asking to spend money?
My children?

Maybe I don’t want to use public transportation. If you want it, you pay for it.

Anonymous
2 months ago

We pay for the roads we don’t want. What’s the difference?

Anonymous
2 months ago

those roads “we don’t want” are used when you call 911 or when Amazon delivers your panties.

Make Miami Sophisticated Again
2 months ago

Nice, let’s add more highways instead of addressing the real issue by getting people of the road and expanding public transit. Wow.

Anonymous
2 months ago

I like that they’ll be adding new bike lanes and sidewalks to this area. The pedestrian/cyclist experience in this part of downtown is awful.

Ana
2 months ago

I’m glad someone actually read the article

Anonymous
2 months ago

Good luck walking or biking through homeless encampments.

Bill
2 months ago

I am creating a perfume based on homeless encampments…it will be for people during a pandemic that want to social distance.

anon
2 months ago

tearing down the highway exit/entry entirely will do more positive to the neighborhood than all 3 Hyatt towers combined

Anonymous
2 months ago

How? 300k vehicles go over that bridge every day in each direction. Is anyone considering reality. We can’t do a big dig in Miami. STOP BEING SO NORTH EASTERN PEOPLE

Anonymous
2 months ago

Translation to English: Stop being smart and embracing innovation, just accept the status quo.

Anonymous
2 months ago

wrong, translation – accept the limitation of your engineering enviroment and topography.

Sustainable Miami Success
2 months ago

The feasibility of incorporating a new tunnel, pedestrian bridge, and/or fixed bridge to Brickell should be thoroughly examined for the construction of the new ramp. Additionally, careful attention should be given to the design of the columns, ensuring they are aesthetically pleasing. Furthermore, the area below the ramp should be utilized effectively, either as a park or well-designed public space.

Ana
2 months ago

Is anyone reading the articles anymore, or are people just howling like wolves into the night. The article is not about the Brickell Downtown bridge or a replacement tunnel. It’s about an off ramp deeper into downtown. It’s fine to be against it, but this is not the change to sound off about a totally different agenda. Can we please get a grip?

Anon
2 months ago

Jesus Christ, please people vote. Miami will never be great if we keep voting these absolute morons in over and over again.

Anonymous
2 months ago

Vote for who, the other worse poison Ken Russell 2.0?

Downtowner
2 months ago

I’m glad that people are at least considering changes. That intersection with the exit ramp at the Hyatt/Knight Center is a disaster.

Anonymous
2 months ago

It’s the worst traffic area in the city and dumb planning. Why doesn’t Miami have turn lanes or one way streets? This would keep people from getting stuck

Anonymous
2 months ago

Biscayne Blvd needs the Green Biscayne plan back!!

Anonymous
2 months ago

Don’t worry. Carollo will spiff it up by recommending the use of ASStroturf, replacing shade trees with more palms, dog statutes, and having it named after one of his buddies with two long last names.

Anonymous
2 months ago

I like astroturf, palms, statues, and long last names.

T G
2 months ago

they’ll just cause more traffic by taking 5 years to complete the work.

Mkt Pro
2 months ago

“At the meeting, Carollo asked city officials for a cost update on the study.” **** Psycho Joe 63.5 Mil in the Hoe really loves his cost studies !!! Just put that one behind the Marine Stadium !!!

Anonymous
2 months ago

Where exactly would this extension go? The metromover already runs down SE 3rd St at the offramp’s current terminus on SE 2nd Ave… is the highway going to run above it?

Name*
2 months ago

Yeah how will they get around or over the Wells Fargo building and Metromover?

Ana
2 months ago

Its impossible and clearly a money grab. Government waste at its finest.

Anonymous
2 months ago

“…extending the I-95 on/off ramp to Biscayne Boulevard to alleviate traffic in the area”

by moving it to another area. And all then those roads fill up.

Anonymous
2 months ago

Well, what do you expect when the “Grand Boulevard” scheme from twenty years ago isn’t feasible after every building is a box atop a parking podium with little to no street interaction?

Anonymous
2 months ago

Why don’t they just add a pedestrian and bicycle bridge pier the river, if you can walk up those stairs you can walk over the river, and it’s better than waiting for the bridge

Yay
2 months ago

Great idea. Same should be done on Biscayne for the freight train from Port Miami.

Anonymous
2 months ago

It could be added to the Metromover bridges which are already up.

Anonymous
2 months ago

Yet another study…..

Azarius
2 months ago

Definitely needs to be rebuilt and I love the idea of going to Biscayne blvd to help relieve traffic trying to get to 95

Anonymous
2 months ago

THIS IS INSANE!!!

Go Phins!
2 months ago

Tunnels.

Also, Working with developers is how the river walk gets done over time.

Anonymous
2 months ago

The only true long-term solution to the Brickell bridge is a tunnel, which would alleviate traffic in the immediate and surrounding area. The more they wait the more expensive it gets – the time is now.

Anonymous
2 months ago

Not possible with the limestone and the currents. Also the run up would take nearly a mile for that kind of a tunnel. Not possible, you’d have to tear down the icon or 500 brickell in the process.

Anonymous
2 months ago

Not opposed to that.

Anonymous
2 months ago

Completely false.

No rail, no roads, no futuree
2 months ago

There is literally NO city on planet Earth building more elevated highways in their downtown zone. I’d say 60% are just keeping what is there, and 40% are actively scaling down or even tearing elevated overpasses in downtown zones down. This is what happens when a city is run by people who literally don’t go much further than Domino Park and believe 1962 thinking is still cool. Appalling.

Anonymous
2 months ago

New bike lanes? Do you mean BIKE LANES?

Mitch
2 months ago

Ramps east of Miami avenue should be demolished, the traffic should exit at Miami Ave south or to an expanded SE 3rd St East of Miami Ave. there was even a proposal some time ago that like most good ideas these days end up in a garbage can somewhere.