Commission To Vote On Funding For Edgewater Baywalk Extension

The baywalk in the Edgewater neighborhood currently only exists in small fragments, but a small extension could soon become a reality.

Miami commissioners are scheduled to vote next week on possible funding for the extension, which is known as Edgewater – Phase 1 Project.

The new baywalk would be built behind a 10-story building dating to 1980.

The extension would be short but crucial, connecting existing baywalks behind the Paraiso Bay complex and the Biscayne Beach condo tower (both were completed in the past decade).

The vote would authorize city staff to apply for a $235,000 grant from the Florida Inland Navigation District for the project.

The city would then match that $235,000, plus add another $150,000 towards administrative costs, bringing total funding to $620,000, which is the estimated total cost to build the extension.

The commission vote is scheduled for April 10.

 

 

The Paraiso baywalk in 2018:

 

87 Comments
most voted
newest oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
rainey411
15 days ago

Would be cool if the city could build something like tampas riverwalk where it goes onto the water in certain segments, has shaded sections so we could have a full linear public space from 195 to 395

Downtown Meets Brickell at the River in the M
15 days ago

Exactly—this should be the top priority of the next Mayor of Miami.

The man or Woman who runs on this platform with a concrete plan to overhaul and connect our riverwalk—that person wins my vote.

Anonymous
15 days ago

A lot of people would like to see the Miami River greenway connect. It’s been 85 years.

Let’s get some more grants folks!

John Duns Scotus
15 days ago

The award winning Miami Greenway does connect.
I have been walking it for at least a couple of decades. There are a few places where private property owners have waterfront rights, that the greenway diverts around, but the wayfinding signage, consistent lighting, landscape, park benches, and trash receptacles are ubiquitous.

Anonymous
15 days ago

Tampon and Used Condom Littered awards don’t count

GO BIG
15 days ago

We’ll build around those private owners- their rights don’t outweigh the millions, or just take it away! It’s not going to lose value. Be bold!

GO BIG
15 days ago

Now I know nobody wants a taking, but it’s a LAST resort- those owners can comply with any such LAW, and avoid forfeiture or be compensated and go inland if it doesn’t care about the waterfront.

Brooklyn
15 days ago

or Austin…waiting until buildings are ready to be redeveloped is crazy inefficient.

Real Talk Ryan
15 days ago

Especially when the City actively adopts policies that incentivize development outside our densest zones—causing the city to grow longer, taller, and more spread out. It’s like watching an awkward, perpetually adolescent giant: always partying, staring out at the horizon, daydreaming… but never stretching, never able to reach his toes.

Meanwhile, the central areas that actually need thoughtful public investment and leadership just get more expensive. Why? Because no developer wants to pay a fortune for land that doesn’t come with the same perks and promises other parts of the city are getting handed to them.

John Duns Scotus
15 days ago

What? That is extraordinarily hard to decipher.

Are you saying that the “City actively adopts policies that incentivize development outside our densest zones”??

Okay….so Citadel decided to NOT develop in your example of the adolescent giant.
Santander decided NOT to develolp “outside our densest zones”.
Waldorf Astoria (PMG) NOT to develolp “outside our densest zones”.
FECR at One Biscayne NOT to develolp “outside our densest zones”.

Given all the incentives that you imagine exist, all the smartest developers are developing in our densest zones. Completely opposite of what you are supposing.
Not slightly off, but 180 degrees off. Opposite.

I can’t even begin to understand what you are trying to say in paragraph number 2.

Hiya 👋🏼
15 days ago

Those are WITHIN our densest zones, tid like to see more attention and public planning on what to do when those zones expand outward.

Jordan
14 days ago

I grant your wish!

The 30 year master plan exists. Read it.

Just because you dont know what is going on doesn’t mean that thoughtful people aren’t handling this.

Anonymous
15 days ago

Especially when you can’t even get the same materials or parts from past decades. It’s like a system designed NOT to connect – reform is needed

Bob Ross
15 days ago

What if the City used eminent domain on all bayfront and riverfront properties that block public access—especially those that can’t afford environmentally necessary upgrades—and reopened them for public use and smart redevelopment?

John Duns Scotus
15 days ago

Then, in about a week, the private property owner would contest the eminent domain order, and/or file a Burt Harris Act lawsuit.

Taxpayers would have to support the legal fees for a terrible idea, and nothing would get done.

Grisham
15 days ago

They taxed the fees for Joe Carollos personal disputes – or how to offload that tiny park in Brickell with least amount of liability. I’ll volunteer to take the case pro bono – it seems so clear and dismissible with one motion. Right?

Jordan
14 days ago

Perfect go do it!

John Duns Scotus
15 days ago

Sounds good until you walk up and down the river a couple times and discover that the Miami River is a working river, and the 5th largest port in the State of Florida.

Tampa is definitely beautiful, but it isn’t narrow, and it does not have tugboats doing a tango with a Cargo ships loaded with bicycles, mattresses, and used cars.

Anonymous
15 days ago

I sit outside the tiny sliver almost daily and that one cutout is the nicest and busiest spot in all of Downtown

Anonymous
15 days ago

Nobody wants property near the Hudson River – it has cargo ships

Anonymous
15 days ago

Doesn’t they Bay have more cargo ships plus cruise ships, what’s the point?

Jordan
14 days ago

The river is narrow.
Extending a pedestrian walkway out into the navigable waterway would be dangerous.
The r8ver in Tampa is MUCH wider.
This should be obvious.

Downtowner
15 days ago

Yes, please. Let’s get the Baywalk closer to completion. It’s going to be a phenomenal asset to Edgewater; it’s an investment in the neighborhood.

Downtowner
15 days ago

How about connecting even just the East part of the river walk east of I95–not the mess we have, without all these detours, gaps, and chained fences under bridges

Anonymous
15 days ago

Agree—the city is getting fuller and would like to see both entire river and bay walks connect in a solid 3 part plan like that did with the Underline, it’s more efficient that way.

John Duns Scotus
15 days ago

The land under the Metromover tracks was a right of way controlled by one entity.
The Miami River and the Biscayne Bay land is mostly owned by private individuals.

In the case of this tiny little stretch, the +/- 50ft of baywalk is occupied by a 35 unit condo building and a tiny little pool.

Anonymous
15 days ago

Just take the land – it is a public necessity – we need a better plan to target sea rises and public access is being impeded

anon
13 days ago

a bay walk is NOT a necessity lol, and using “sea rises” as an excuse is a thinly veiled ruse for a power hungry government to take private property

Anonymous
11 days ago

It’s the only actual necessity, if anything is a necessity it’s building bay walk and river walk for rising sea level and adding parks around downtown

Anonymous
15 days ago

You’re not removing value, the value will still be there actually more value after the city owns ot

Howard Roark
15 days ago

The city / county / state / corps of engineers can use eminent domain or something similar to build a path 10 yards into the bay in areas where the path doesn’t connect. Expensive, yes. But doable. Look at Chicago’s Lakeshore Drive. That should be Miami’s example to follow. There should be bike and pedestrian lanes (with great landscaping) from the Tuttle to the Rickenbacker, and along the Miami River at least to Marlins Stadium. Imagine how awesome this city would be if the politicians and zoning planners had the forethought years ago.

Anonymous
11 days ago

Yes they can – West Palm Beach mayor did it for a Cheesecake Factory,

We aren’t idiots!

Anonymous
15 days ago

City of Miami commissioners are out of the city and out of touch.

Oscar
15 days ago

This is for just about 100 linear feet of Baywalk putting the cost at $6,200 / linear foot. On the south side of Biscayne Beach, there are more properties blocking the path which would require another 580′ then roughly another 200′ to get to Mission Baia and then another 200′ or so to get to Bayshore Drive and Pace Park. I’m not counting new construction which will incorporate new additions to the Baywalk. This is all to say that the city might want to be thinking comprehensively and try to find a scalable solution that can have a greater impact.

Anonymous
15 days ago

So this entire project, all the money time everything just serves one penthouse probably.

Anon
15 days ago

Nah the point is merely the illusion of progress – that way they can say they did something without actually having to go full monty

Anonymous
15 days ago

How much overtime and salaries are we paying for people to vote on this and make the request—and was that worth only $235,000?

John Duns Scotus
15 days ago

Correct. But those 100 linear feet are controlled by +/- 35 different owners.
Hard to “special assess them” and impossible to take their land.

The other pieces of the puzzle are going to fall into place as those properties will be redeveloped.

I’ve noticed the City thinking comprehensively about the Baywalk going back to at least 2002.
There are many dynamics involved.

Anonymous
15 days ago

Just answer this – why is it impossible when all of WPB was taken in one large decisive decision and it went from what most of Miami looks like now to what Brickell Avenue looks like.

Anonymous
15 days ago

They should always discuss the River Walk and Bay walk together as one continuous goal.

anonymous
14 days ago

•So, why do some owners get a new coastal walkway connection… and others don’t?
•Is it favoritism or just who puts in a request?
•Is there a waitlist we don’t know about?
•Does it come down to seniority — whoever’s waited the longest?
•Or maybe it’s all about how many people live nearby?

Whatever the reason, it’s worth asking: why here, and not there? Unless it’s done across downtown – it really feels arbitrary and unfair.

Anon
14 days ago

If you count new construction (which, why wouldn’t you as they are required to include the bay walk in their projects?), this is the last piece required to get from Margaret Pace park to Paraiso. There is new development along the bay already in progress (Aria Reserve and Villa Miami) or announced (Cove Miami and Edition Residences Edgewater). The land north of Missoni is owned by the same developer and will eventually include a bay walk once plans are announced. This is a good investment by the city for one of the fastest growing areas in Miami.

real estate BS
15 days ago

when do we do this under the port bridge to connect bayside to the northern baywalk. This would be used by more people

John Duns Scotus
15 days ago

Did they close that permenantly for some reason?
Sometimes, they would put up a temporary fence if they were using that Parcel B (or whatever) for an event staging area, like races or Ultras, or whatevers.

I used to walk that all the time…there were always a ton of feeding dolphins right after every Miami Heat game as you walk back to Brickell.

Brandon Bach
15 days ago

Over 30% in administrative costs, now that sounds like government.

John Duns Scotus
15 days ago

Good eye. Its ridiculous.

John Duns Scotus
15 days ago

Beautiful math. So the two grants add up to $470,000 and administrative fees are $150,000 are on top of that?

I’d manage and oversee that patch that’s about 1/5 the size of my driveway for $100,000.
Connecting at this point has got to be less than 50ft with a 35 unit condo building built in 1981.

Better to just let the 35 condo owners sell out to developer who can improve the Baywalk on his dime.

Concerned Local Resident
15 days ago

This is a HORRIBLE way to for the city to spend taxpayer money. There is police activity at this baywalk several times a day at all hours of the day every single day from nuisance calls. It makes the residents feel very unsafe. Go pull all of the police reports and activity. The amount of taxpayer resouces that are being spent already to protect this residential community from this baywalk has been astronomical. The benches from the baywalk have already had to be removed because of the amount of nuisance activity and vandalism on this baywalk. The only reason the city is even passing this to begin with is because they are being paid off by developers because they have wanted to knock down Bayview Tower Condominium at 555 NE 30th Street Miami, FL 33137 (a 36 unit residence) for quite some time and the owners will simply not sell. The city had Bayview Tower Condo redo their dock as part of the 40 year recertification and when the plans were submitted for the new dock, the city denied them. Meanwhile, Bay Park Towers Condominium at 3301 NE 5th Ave which should be getting this exact same bay walk got to keep their dock and will not have to build the baywalk. Why, because developers are not trying to buy this building. Just yet another tactic to push out longstanding elderly Miami residents for over 40 years from their home just so the city can make more money. This baywalk would be directly in front of the Bayview Tower pool in which these nuisance vagrants would then be constantly vandalizing and trespassing on the property more than they have already tried to do. Stop ruining what is left of the charm of Miami. There are already too much bushings and foot traffic on this part of the Biscayne corridor and our infrastructure just cannot support it. We do not have mass transit. This city plan is not a city plan, it’s a money plan.

Anonymous
15 days ago

Miami’s flush with funding, but too much of it goes to flashy projects that don’t serve people—just help sell condos.

Meanwhile, our avenues in central downtown, and where the city connects with Brickell along the river and the Riverwalk, are stuck with crumbling infrastructure and neglected public space. These are the areas that actually serve residents and visitors alike.

If Riverwalk funding isn’t part of the plan, the whole thing should be vetoed – vote no.

John Duns Scotus
15 days ago

In the time that I lived in the Brickell neighborhood, the
* Brickell AVENUE bridge was replaced and renovated.
* Miami AVENUE bridge was replaced and renovated.
* NW 2nd AVENUE bridge was replaced and renovated.
* Flagler Street bridge was replaced and renovated.

So clearly you are not well informed. But keep up the passion! Hope to see you on one of the X posts where the “passionate” person is removed from the flight for getting passionate about nothing and wasting everyone else’s time.

Anonymous
15 days ago

You’ve been here for 50 years – and can you paint them and remove the passed out people on the steps? We can’t get through and no bike lanes

Anonymous
15 days ago

Carollo: “Will it have dog statues?”

Anan
15 days ago

Woof

Andrew
15 days ago

It’s hard to find a city they DOESN’T have a bay/river walk yet we treat it as some massive undertaking that should take decades to piece together. The city/county needs to fund it and build it in a single project. Like mentioned by others, look at Tampa and Austin. There’s zero reason we can’t have something similar.

Anonymous
15 days ago

Little towns in Florida with a population of 100 have them all around.

Anonymous
15 days ago

New York has walk ways and bike paths , around the entire perimeter and they are building more little islands and beaches. Miami is in dire need of intervention by the Governor. What’s the deal?

John Duns Scotus
15 days ago

I can immediately think of Dallas, Atlanta, Phoenix, Las Vegas, and Charlotte.

Yeah….hard for some people. Please learn about the issue before blowing a gasket. The Miami River Commission meeting are open to the public. Go learn..

The City of Miami and Miami-Dade Commission meetings are open to the public.

Apply to LeadershipMiami and if you are accepted you will learn how the city, state, and probably the world if you chose to get really involved.

Anonymous
11 days ago

They never show up.

Anonymous
15 days ago

VOTE YES!!

Likes to walk
15 days ago

YES!

Anonymous
15 days ago

People don’t even want this. What developer is benefiting?

Anonymous
15 days ago

Who’s people?? We absolutely do want this in Edgewater. The parts of our baywalk that are completed are highly utilized already. It would be a game changer to have it all the way completed.

John Duns Scotus
15 days ago

Highly utilized?

What does that mean for the guy in Little Havana? You mean, your Hoka’s are wearing down the pavers and if the guy in Little Havana just chipped in some extra cash, the afternoon run would utilize the space even more?

Why don’t the people of Edgewater put together a crusade….a GoFundMe…or do what Meg Daly did; get corporate sponsors to donate to a vision to put in some money to pay for that baywalk.

Step One: Hit up the 35 condo owning dopes who control that 100 ft to get involved.

Anonymous
15 days ago

Seriously it’s 230k! We have to vote and apply for grants—is this city that poor?

John Duns Scotus
15 days ago

I’m sure that about 20% of the +/- 15,000 voting aged Edgewater residents would vote yes.

Of course, those 3,000 Edgewater people are voting that the 400,000 people who do not live in Edgewater would care that their money is allocated to this.

Anonymous
15 days ago

It’s our money and we want the entire thing done- stop manipulating us with (oh you don’t want one crumb—throwing the cake away) approach

Anonymous
11 days ago

This is a no-brainer! Get it done!

Anonymous
15 days ago

How about just getting the grant, no vote, and use it?

Jeremey Howlett
15 days ago

It would be nice if they just built the entire bay walk and sea walls in one go, that way elevations and design stays consistent. The current system in place is making an infrastructure mess of the city.

Anonymous
15 days ago

agree 100 percent – not doing the river walk and bay walk gaps now in one swoop is negligent

Anonymous
15 days ago

Not just one gap – that’s NOT fair. IRS favoritism in gov – do the whole thing, so silly and upsetting

Nike
15 days ago

How is this even a debate? Just do it.

Anonymous
15 days ago

It costs most to debate than the 230k they get IF it’s submitted and approved.

Calivalle
15 days ago

Let’s get it done.. Can you imagine biking from Brickell underline to I-195.🚲

Anonymous
15 days ago

No because the Brickell river walk that connects Brickell to downtown is being neglected as well are large parts of the baywalk in downtown and Brickell,

Before expanding, fix what we have!

anonymous
14 days ago

I’d honestly love this. I wish we had a pedestrian-only bridge near the Underline — something you could walk or bike on from Brickell to Worldcenter. It could go high enough to stay open for boats, and totally separate from cars. Or even just a proper bike lane on the bridges we already have — so we’re not stuck choosing between getting hit by a car or running into someone on foot. 🚙 🚲🚶‍♀️

Jeremey Howlett
14 days ago

The people want a terraced bay walk, one elevation at current sea wall
Levels and the other at old sea wall levels. This will allow people to feel more connected to the water. Since king tides are only a few weeks out of the year, it makes more sense to build this way. The lower level could be filled with grass that can tolerate occasional flooding. This little detail or enhancement will make for a more enjoyable experience on the bay walk.

Yesla
15 days ago

Something smells fishy here, and it’s not the sewage spill they had this time.

Edgewater doesn’t need this baywalk. You only ever see a few people playing volleyball. Every condo already has its own park and pool overlooking the bay, and Margaret Pace Park is already a massive bayfront public space right next door. This is just redundant filler… If we’re serious about cutting waste and building a city that works for people, maybe it’s time to send in DOGE.

Anonymous
15 days ago

Absolutely false. Edgewater residents have been waiting for our baywalk to be completed for years!! The parts that are completed are already highly utilized!

Anonymous
15 days ago

Someone here always reminds us that Edgwater has a baywalk already.

Anonymous
15 days ago

You mean there are actual residents in Edgewater waiting on promised improvements, and not landlords short-term renting out to OF influencers?

Anonymous
15 days ago

You mean there are actual residents in Edgewater waiting on promised improvements, and not landlords short-term renting out to OF influencers?

Anon
15 days ago

why are there so many losers on here that just post snarky comments

John Duns Scotus
15 days ago

It’s to counter-balance the number the commenters who are NEVER correct, but never unsure of themselves.

Excellent question Sir!!

John Duns Scotus
15 days ago

“Our baywalk”.
Go knock on the doors of the Condo building at 555 NE 30th Street….tell them that their land is yours.

Go get their crusader! Tell them that if they only took down the wall and security fence that you would utilize their property.

Just let them know…you have been waiting to take control of their property to utilize it for them.

anonymous
14 days ago

Both the Miami Riverwalk and Baywalk were envisioned as continuous public promenades along the city’s waterfront — the Riverwalk tracing the Miami River and the Baywalk following Biscayne Bay. These walkways aim to connect neighborhoods, promote walkability, and provide scenic public access to the shoreline. As of now, the Baywalk is about 88% complete, while the Riverwalk is around 65%.

A major challenge for both projects lies in coordinating development across private properties. A 1979 city ordinance requires new waterfront developments to include public access, but enforcement has been inconsistent, and older properties are often exempt. Some newer buildings construct walkways that serve only their own footprint, without connecting to adjacent sections, disrupting the continuity.

The long-term vision for the Riverwalk even extends all the way to Miami International Airport, with the first key goals connecting Downtown to the Civic Center area along the other side of I-95. Until there’s stronger coordination and oversight, both walkways risk falling short of their promise as truly unified public spaces, leaving so much potential at the whims of time and chance.

Jordan
14 days ago

Thanks ChatGPT.
You referenced, “Some newer buildings construct walkways that serve only their own footprint, without connecting to adjacent sections”.

Can you please list 5 properties where this is a fact?